menuMENU    UK Free TV logo Radio

 

 

Click to see updates

The end is near for analogue radio... Part 4, the local radio to do list

In this final part, we have a quick look at what is still left to do for local radio to match FM coverage.

In this final part, we have a quick look at what is still left
published on UK Free TV

As we saw from part one, radio started out as a regional services. From this national networks were added. Then from 1969 onwards, local radio was added.

However, running a network of local radio stations, all with their own output, staff, presenter and news has always stretched the budget of individual stations a little bit thin.

This is as true for BBC stations, which share a small proportion, 4.6% of the TV Licence (£114.7m on content, £9.9m on distribution, £27.9 on infrastructure, making £152.5m), as it is for local commercial stations that fund themselves from adverts.



DAB local radio

Almost all of the country does now have a local radio DAB service - see List of all DAB multiplexes, but there are still some on the "to do very soon" list.



The "missing" services cover 5,583,000 people, which is about 9% of the UK population.

These are:

Cumbria - 408,000 people

Derbyshire - 652,000 people, Now Digital (East Midlands) Limited

Gloucestershire - 498,000 people, MuxCo (Gioucestershire) Limited

Hereford and Worcester - 501,000 people, MuxCo (South Midlands) Limited

Lincolnshire - 550,000 people, MuxCo Lincolnshire Limited

Mid and West Wales 377,000 people, MuxCo Wales Limited

North Yorkshire - 531,000 people, MuxCo North Yorkshire Limited

Somerset - 444,000 people, MuxCo Somerset Limited

Suffolk - 541,000 people

Surrey about 1.085 million people, MuxCo Surrey and North Sussex Limited



Why can't we have local radio on Freeview?

The Freeview service is provided on six Multiplexes. Like the DAB multiplexes, these services provide a large number of channels together on a single broadcast.

The three "commercial" multiplexes operate a UK wide service, and are therefore unsuitable for local radio. One of the "public service" multiplexes is for high definition TV services only.

This leaves the BBC and Digital 3+4 multiplexes. However, even though these services are "regional", they each cover many "local radio" areas. It would therefore be impracticable to add so many local stations to either multiplex.

However, Local television on Freeview is coming. These services are designed to provide a local TV service to specific local areas. It may be possible for each of these multiplexes to have local radio added to them.

Why can't we have BBC local radio on Freesat or Sky?

The additional cost for the BBC to add the 39 local radio stations not on digital satellite (BC London 94.9 is already there) to the four DVB-S mode transponders would probably be marginal.

However, the BBC does have to currently pay Sky a large fee to add channels to the Sky EPG, so this would be perhaps unreasonably expensive (see Government to stop Sky charging public service broadcasters for "retransmission").

And whist the BBC owns Freesat, it would probably not be worth the bother of up linking 39 radio streams if Sky viewers could not also benefit.

See also BBC - Annual Report 2012/13 - Expenditure



Help with TV/radio stations?
Can I receive British Eurosport for free?1
Can I receive DAB radio too?2
Can I get E4 with this service?3
Is sky|one going on Freeview?4
Can I watch for free Financial channels such as CNBC or Bloomberg?5
In this section
Which 45 masts transmit the 15 new national DAB radio stations? 1
UK Free TV: 392 AM radio transmissions now have coverage maps2
New! 1000s of new DAB and FM radio coverage maps3
We ARE going to get BBC Local Radio on Freeview ... today!4
How do the two new national DAB radio bids compare?5
More digital radio stations. Ofcom - finally - proposes DAB+6

Comments
Wednesday, 18 September 2013
S
sharealam
sentiment_satisfiedSilver

7:17 AM

PJH: that is good news cassette tapes are making a comeback

link to this comment
sharealam's 223 posts EU
T
Trevor Harris
sentiment_satisfiedGold

10:44 AM

@Mark

DAB+ does not give only a slight improvment in error correction. DAB uses unequal error protection using convolutional error correction coding. This means that different parts of the DAB signal have different levels of correction. The part of the stream which contains the audio information has the lowest level of correction. The overal level of correction is very weak compared to DAB+.

I don't know where you got the 2% figure but that certainly not my experience. In fact DAB is famous for the burbling sound it can produce under non ideal conditions. DAB+ gives a much sharper cutoff with weak signals.

For a good comparision of DAB and DAB+ see

DAB vs DAB+

Although DAB+ is much better than DAB it still cannot replace FM. The BBC could be charged with misselling DAB. Infact they had to pull some of thier adverts where they claimed that DAB was CD quality.



link to this comment
Trevor Harris's 366 posts GB
P
PJH
sentiment_satisfiedSilver

3:49 PM

No it isn't sharealem.

They were horrible in their heyday and they're horrible now, even with Dolby noise reduction, which compressed the sound so much they sounded better with it turned off, tape noise aside.

Add to the fact that one dirty tape would ruin your whole collection of tapes,I fail to understand the appeal.

Why mini disc didn't replace it is beyond me.

link to this comment
PJH's 240 posts GB
P
PJH
sentiment_satisfiedSilver

3:52 PM

Trevor: You can even hear the difference between DAB and FM on a portable mono radio. FM has much better sound quality.

DAB is superior to AM, even in mono, but there's no way it comes close to FM unless the bit rate is very high.

We should ask ourselves why the BBC have Radio 3 at 192 kbps.

link to this comment
PJH's 240 posts GB
P
PJH
sentiment_satisfiedSilver

3:56 PM

To be honest, I'd rather have fewer stations on DAB at higher bit rates and in stereo, than a whole pile at lower bit rates and in mono.

Music stations in mono at low bit rates totally defeats the purpose of DAB.

link to this comment
PJH's 240 posts GB
Briantist
sentiment_very_satisfiedOwner

4:15 PM

sharealam: You must have missed out on the joy of wow and flutter and azimuth errors.

Not to mention having to splice the flimsy stuff together with tape when they snapped.

Or the particular joy of flattening the batteries on your Walkman because you used "fast forward".

Or having to "save" your ZX Spectrum programme five or six times because you might want to load it back in.

Or dropouts: I still know the location of many of them in tracks I have in perfect digital quality now.

link to this comment
Briantist's 38,846 posts GB
S
sharealam
sentiment_satisfiedSilver

4:32 PM

briantist,i happy because i have a box full of cassette tapes thats why i am happy to see cassette tapes come back.

link to this comment
sharealam's 223 posts EU
M
MikeB
sentiment_very_satisfiedPlatinum

4:56 PM

Briatnist: Looking at where this discussion is going, perhaps all the hipsters are about to start using 8 track cassettes again! Of course all the music will be from about 1973, but I think thats when some seem to think technology should have stopped...

Sharealam: I think PJH was making a joke about cassettes coming back. They really are not - and they sound pretty awful compared with everything else.

PJH: Apparently the last minidisc player was sold in March this year! On the other hand, the MP3 had basically killed it after 1998 (and it wasn't doing all that well before then).

Right, I'm waiting for someone to shout out the benefits of the Edison wax cylinder. Very analogue.

link to this comment
MikeB's 2,575 posts GB
K
KMJ,Derby
sentiment_satisfiedGold

6:38 PM

PJH: Better sound quality on a portable radio on FM? Maybe if you live in a strong signal area. FM reception on the average portable radio using a telescopic rod aerial in many areas is frequently marred by hiss and buzzing or whining in the background from any computer in use within a hundred yards of the receiver!

link to this comment
KMJ,Derby's 1,811 posts GB
P
PJH
sentiment_satisfiedSilver

8:17 PM

KMJ: Yes, undoubtedly. On a Pure Move 400D FM sounds warmer and more mellow than DAB.

The difference is there and very obvious.

The same can be said for every DAB/FM portable that I've owned.

In the area that I live in FM reception is not marred by hiss, buzzing, or whining in the background.

I've never been to Derby KMJ, but in the many towns and cities I've visited in the UK I've never encountered any of these adverse effects on FM. .

link to this comment
PJH's 240 posts GB
Select more comments

Your comment please
Please post a question, answer or commentUK Free TV is here to help people. If you are rude or disrespectful all of your posts will be deleted and you will be banned.







Privacy policy: UK Free Privacy policy.