Freeview reception - all about aerials
Updated 8th January 2014.
Your ability of receive all the Freeview transmissions depends on the suitability of aerial
- the design style,
- the "group", and
- its physical location.
Standard type - Yagi aerial
The standard type of TV aerial is known as the Yagi aerial. It is mounted on a pole, and consists of a rod with a reflector (shown green) at the back and many spiky elements (in grey) at the front. The connecting cable connects to the element nearest the reflector, known as the driver (shown in blue).
These Yagi aerials are directional and so pick up signals best from a transmitter that the rod points towards. The more elements the aerial has, the better it picks up a signal and becomes more directional.
A standard-type aerial is all that is required for digital TV reception in most places. These antennae have between 10 and 18 elements and a single reflector. These are recommended for new installations for good digital television reception, but will more often than not function perfectly in good reception areas.
Typically these aerials are designed to receive only some transmission frequencies - see "groups" below.
High Gain aerials
These aerials are designed for poor digital reception areas, and have two reflectors. For maximum signal strength, some digital high gain aerials have up to 100 elements. Since the switchover to digital-only transmissions back in October 2012, most UK households now have good quality digital TV signals.
A more expensive aerial is only required where the signal strength is low, but can often provide the whole Freeview reception where it might otherwise be impossible.
The CAI (that represents aerial installers) has four standards for digital TV aerials. The highest standard "1" is for homes on the fringes of coverage areas, intermediate standard "2" is suitable for use within the coverage area; minimum standard "3" is for good coverage conditions.
These aerials can be either wideband, or receive only selected frequencies - see "groups" below.
Grid
You may haved used a 'Grid aerial' for analogue reception, but as they are generally unsuitable for Freeview reception, they have now generally been replaced by the Yagi type. However in some places a Grid aerial installation may work for Freeview: otherwise replace with a standard Yagi aerial.
Indoor
Indoor aerials are generally not suitable for Freeview reception. In areas of good signal strength it is often possible to receive some transmissions. Even where an aerial works, people often find that may get interruptions to their viewing (or recording).Loft mounted
Loft mounted arrivals are not generally recommended for Freeview reception, as the roof tiles and plumbing will degrade the signal. Some compensation for this loss of signal can be made by using satellite-grade cable to connect the set top box to the aerial.Positioning
The best position for a TV aerial is mounted outdoors, as high from the ground as possible, pointing directly at the transmitter. The signal can be blocked by hills and tall buildings. It should be positioned away from any other aerials.Horizontal or vertical?
The transmitter will either use vertical mode which requires the elements of your aerial to be up-down, or horizontal mode which requires them to be level with the ground.Groups
Both analogue and digital television is transmitted the same group of transmission frequencies (known as channel 21 through to 60). A coloured marking on the aerial shows the group.To create the best possible analogue picture, TV transmissions from adjacent transmitters have been designated to several different groups of frequencies. By using an aerial that receives only the channels in the correct group, the analogue picture can be kept free from interference.
To receive Freeview transmissions from the same transmitter it has been sometimes necessary to use frequencies that are not part of the transmitter's normal group. When this has occurred, the aerial will need to be replaced with a "wideband" aerial (also known as group W) - one that covers every group.
As Ofcom is planning to move the TV frequencies again - perhaps as soon as 2018 - it may be wise to use a wideband aerial if you can to ensure you can keep viewing Freeview for many years to come.
Help with Television sets?
Saturday, 7 July 2012
L
linda gormley1:40 PM
the apartment we have moved into is wired up to recieve sky tv but we prefer virgin and had this installed the arial fitting in bedroom only recieves sky we only want to recieve ordinary tv in this room and dont want to run wires through walls is there any convertion connections on the market
link to this comment |
S
Stephen P3:15 PM
Linda what do you mean by "ordinary"? If you have a satellite dish - eg for Sky - you cannot*** receive "Freeview" but you can get almost exactly the same from "Freesat"
*** unless you have a VERY strong signal thay you can receive just from the cable.
link to this comment |
Thursday, 19 July 2012
P
Paul H7:53 PM
My TV aerial recently came down and I need to replace it. One potential supplier has offered me a range of swanky new aerials whereas another has suggested putting back my existing one.
The existing one had been up since I moved in (making it over 10 years old at least) but it picked up freeview fine. The aerial supplies a single cable to my loft from which a booster splitter sends it to two TVs.
Can anyone advise me of a suitable replacement aerial (or indeed whether I should replace my existing one at all) and also explain whether/why I need to pay for additional TV points.
My postcode is NG2.
link to this comment |
J
jb388:25 PM
Paul H: Waltham appears to be the best bet for reception in that part of Nottingham and a standard Log 40 aerial should be a perfect replacement for your old one.
If the old aerial is of the age mentioned then I wouldn't really advise using it again because its bound to be suffering from elements of corrosion somewhere, as alloys always do.
I don't quite understand what you are meaning by why you should pay for extra TV points? or are you meaning the aerial person wanted to replace them? as if that's what was said then its unnecessary to do this if they were working OK.
This is a link where you will see the Log 40 referred to.
Online TV FM DAB Aerial sales
link to this comment |
P
Paul H9:44 PM
Thanks for the replies. I'll try to answer your questions as best I can.
Firstly, my current set up is this: a cable runs from the aerial into my loft and down into room 1 where a powered booster splits the signal.
One aerial company said all this needed taking out and that I'd need a second TV point installing, which would cost me. I don't know what he meant by "TV point" (my better half had this conversation, not I).
My point is: shouldn't my current set up work with a new aerial without the need for TV points?
Secondly, the current aerial came down because the lashing snapped.
link to this comment |
J
jb3811:29 PM
Paul H: If the cable run from the loft down to the booster / splitter was working perfectly OK before the aerial problem occurred then it will still be, and as such does NOT require to be altered.
I suspect though that the aerial company is thinking along the lines of having the booster / splitter in the loft and running two feeds from the loft down to an outlet socket in each room, which of course ends up with exactly the same facilities as you presently have albeit "maybe" a little neater.
You could if you wish still use your old aerial, but speaking from an engineers viewpoint I wouldn't, and especially if it might even be older than the ten years that you know about, but of course the choice is entirely yours.
link to this comment |
P
Paul H11:35 PM
Actually, the chap was suggesting ripping the whole lot out and running a cable down the front of the house and drilling through the wall into the upper bedroom and lower lounge, fitting an extra TV point to allow this.
link to this comment |
Friday, 20 July 2012
J
jb3812:07 AM
Paul H: Yes, in other words reinstalling everything in a somewhat more pleasing neater fashion, but though with the end result of this work only providing you with exactly the same facilities as you presently have as nothing will be be gained in the technical sense, not of course that this is required anyway if your reception was previously OK.
link to this comment |
J
jb3812:13 AM
Paul H: What was said is taking it that when you had previously mentioned the signal being split, that this split was for purposes of feeding the signal to the lounge and upper bedroom referred to?
link to this comment |
S
Stephen P1:00 AM
You want the other one.
Though to be fair, if your system is very old he may not want you blaming him for early failure.
link to this comment |
Select more comments
Your comment please