Full Freeview on the Sudbury (Suffolk, England) transmitter
 | Google Streetview |  | Google map |  | Bing map |  | Google Earth |  | 52.005,0.786 or 52°0'17"N 0°47'8"E |  | CO10 5NG |
The symbol shows the location of the Sudbury (Suffolk, England) transmitter which serves 440,000 homes. The bright green areas shown where the signal from this transmitter is strong, dark green areas are poorer signals. Those parts shown in yellow may have interference on the same frequency from other masts.
This transmitter has no current reported problems
The BBC and Digital UK report there are no faults or engineering work on the Sudbury (Suffolk, England) transmitter._______
Digital television services are broadcast on a multiplexes (or Mux) where many stations occupy a single broadcast frequency, as shown below.
64QAM 8K 3/4 27.1Mb/s DVB-T MPEG2
H/V: aerial position (horizontal or vertical)
The Sudbury (Suffolk, England) mast is a public service broadcasting (PSB) transmitter, it does not provide these commercial (COM) channels: .
If you want to watch these channels, your aerial must point to one of the 80 Full service Freeview transmitters. For more information see the will there ever be more services on the Freeview Light transmitters? page.
Which Freeview channels does the Sudbury transmitter broadcast?
If you have any kind of Freeview fault, follow this Freeview reset procedure first.Digital television services are broadcast on a multiplexes (or Mux) where many stations occupy a single broadcast frequency, as shown below.
64QAM 8K 3/4 27.1Mb/s DVB-T MPEG2
H/V: aerial position (horizontal or vertical)
The Sudbury (Suffolk, England) mast is a public service broadcasting (PSB) transmitter, it does not provide these commercial (COM) channels: .
If you want to watch these channels, your aerial must point to one of the 80 Full service Freeview transmitters. For more information see the will there ever be more services on the Freeview Light transmitters? page.
Which BBC and ITV regional news can I watch from the Sudbury transmitter?
BBC Look East (East) 0.8m homes 3.2%
from Norwich NR2 1BH, 77km north-northeast (24°)
to BBC East region - 27 masts.
70% of BBC East (East) and BBC East (West) is shared output
ITV Anglia News 0.8m homes 3.2%
from NORWICH NR1 3JG, 78km north-northeast (24°)
to ITV Anglia (East) region - 26 masts.
All of lunch, weekend and 80% evening news is shared with Anglia (West)
Are there any self-help relays?
| Felixstowe West | Transposer | 1000 homes +1000 or more homes due to expansion of affected area? | |
| Witham | Transposer | 14 km NE Chelmsford. | 118 homes |
How will the Sudbury (Suffolk, England) transmission frequencies change over time?
| 1984-97 | 1997-98 | 1998-2011 | 2011-13 | 1 Aug 2018 | |||||
| B E T | B E T | B E T | E T | K T | |||||
| C29 | SDN | ||||||||
| C31 | ArqA | ||||||||
| C35 | C5waves | C5waves | |||||||
| C37 | ArqB | ||||||||
| C41 | ITVwaves | ITVwaves | ITVwaves | D3+4 | D3+4 | ||||
| C44 | BBC2waves | BBC2waves | BBC2waves | BBCA | BBCA | ||||
| C47 | C4waves | C4waves | C4waves | BBCB | BBCB | ||||
| C51tv_off | BBC1waves | BBC1waves | BBC1waves | ||||||
| C56tv_off | ArqB | ||||||||
| C58tv_off | SDN | ||||||||
| C60tv_off | -ArqA |
tv_off Being removed from Freeview (for 5G use) after November 2020 / June 2022 - more
Table shows multiplexes names see this article;
green background for transmission frequencies
Notes: + and - denote 166kHz offset; aerial group are shown as A B C/D E K W T
waves denotes analogue; digital switchover was 6 Jul 11 and 20 Jul 11.
How do the old analogue and currrent digital signal levels compare?
| Analogue 1-4 | 250kW | |
| SDN, ARQA, ARQB, BBCA, D3+4, BBCB | (-4dB) 100kW | |
| Analogue 5 | (-7dB) 50kW | |
| Mux 2* | (-14.9dB) 8.1kW | |
| Mux B* | (-15.2dB) 7.5kW | |
| Mux 1* | (-15.5dB) 7kW | |
| Mux A* | (-17dB) 5kW | |
| Mux C* | (-22.2dB) 1.5kW | |
| Mux D* | (-23.6dB) 1.1kW |
Which companies have run the Channel 3 services in the Sudbury transmitter area
|
|
Monday, 12 December 2011
N
Neil9:19 AM
Norm de Plume
Thnak you for a very succinct explanation of what has happened and the reasons behind it.
However I'm sure we're all equally shocked and distgusted that the transmitter engineers are able to do this, let alone without any prior warning or explanation, having already gone though a campaign to 'switchover' in the July - there was never anything said then that what need in July must be suitable for 'lower strength' signal coming in November.
How do I raise a complaint to these people - just directly with OFCOM?
| link to this comment |
Tuesday, 13 December 2011
N
Norm De Plume7:36 AM
Neil,
This was known about before the switchover; it was being talked about by Mike Dimmick on the 28th June, for instance. I think that it isn't the engineers' fault, but the fault of the people providing the information about the switchover.
To be honest, I'm a bit surprised that Briantist hasn't updated the info at the top of the page to show the true existing channels or the final timescale. It would save a lot of people being very confused because they just want to know what channels to search for and they don't have the time or knowledge to go back through 10 pages of posts about MUXes, modes, powers etc.
| link to this comment |
S
Stephen5:08 PM
My Home Entertainment Products
Panasonic LCD TV - TX-32LXD700
Panasonic Diga DVD Recorder with Hard Drive - DMR-EX89EB
Panasonic Diga VHS/DVD recorder - DMR-EZ49VEB
We are also on the Sudbury transmitter.
When I recently purchased the DMR-EZ49VEB VHS/DVD recorder it displayed all the TV channels after setup. Yet since carrying out a 'New Channel' update recently I can no longer get Film4 or the Yesterday channels to show in the TV Guide+ listing. I have re-tuned automatically and manually following both the manual book instructions and DigitalUK's instructions until I'm blue in the face. But still they will not show.
Am I doing something wrong?
By the way, both Film4 and the Yesterday channels show up fine on the TX-32LXD700 TV and the DMR-EX89EB DVD recorder, with excellent picture quality. So I am obviously receiving a good signal.
HELP please!!
| link to this comment |
Stephen: Well, as the saying goes, two out of three ain't bad.
Bearing in mind that there are lots of people that can't get these channels now, you are doing well.
Not all devices are of equal sensitivity.
You could take the VHS/DVD to another aerial socket if you have one; or plug it straight into the aerial outlet if it's via another device or extension lead.
Or try wiping the tuned channels on the VHS/DVD and manually tuning them all, doing C63 first.
| link to this comment |
Wednesday, 14 December 2011
S
Stephen8:45 AM
I'm not sure what cooking has to do with anything on this site. Very strange
Dave
Two out of three isn't bad. But when you have had three out of three and lose one you tend to notice these little things.
| link to this comment |
Thursday, 15 December 2011
N
Norm De Plume7:13 AM
Stephen,
Try swapping devices between rooms, if they are being used in different rooms. Pr swap the aerial leads around - some devices are more sensitive to signal loss than others and looping through another device rarely improves the signal level. Consider having custom leads made up with quality wire - it's generally cheaper than buying new leads and the improvement is worth it.
If all else fails, wait until June 27th 2012 when there will be yet another retune and your Film4 signal should be readily received.
| link to this comment |
J
jb388:56 AM
Stephen: Plus in addition to the very valid suggestion made by Norm De Plume, it should be pointed out that because some programmes can be received on one piece of equipment but not another does not mean that a good signal is being received, as a signal that's just and no more above the reception threshold of the receiving device gives exactly the same quality as one that's touching near to 100%, 95% or so being a safe level on most equipment to avoid any tendencies for intermittent signal overload situations to occur in its tuner, some tuners being more vulnerable to this than others.
If by any chance both recording devices are being used in the same location, then its not advisable to "daisy chain" the aerial feeds as this encourages the sort of problem you are experiencing, but feed the aerial into a three, or more common, four way powered splitter and have each device fed from that, as this arrangement guarantees that each device will be receiving exactly the same signal.
It would have been of assistance though to have had knowledge of your location (pref: post code) in relation to the Sudbury transmitter.
| link to this comment |
S
Stephen9:39 AM
Norm De Plume and jb38
Thank you both for your advice.
My location is Maldon.
jb38. I think your reference to the daisy chain linking to all three units may be worth looking into.
I have only had the VHS/DVD recorder from new since the 22nd November. And all three freeview tuners were displaying all channels fine then using the aerial daisy chain method.
Oh well, I shall have a play around. otherwise I'll wait until June and see what happens.
If I get it sorted I'll let you know what the outcome was. Thanks again all.
| link to this comment |
K
Kevin Hodges6:28 PM
Chelmsford
Stephen: I agree with all the above, in addition I would suggest as fewer connections as possible between the aerial and TV. To this extent, where possible, I have the aerial lead coming directly out of the wall into the TV. This avoids the possibility of the lead being kinked in the aerail socket wall box. This approach is ideal where a wall mounted flat screen TV is used.
| link to this comment |
Kevin's: mapK's Freeview map terrainK's terrain plot wavesK's frequency data K's Freeview Detailed Coverage
Saturday, 17 December 2011
A
alan7:18 AM
I live at Bures, 2.3km from the mast.
I have erected on the chimney a 36 element w/b Labgear yagi which has a 5 metre coax run to the TV in my upstairs workshop.
The reception is hopeless, some nights all the C63 channels are missing.
Even with an amp at the back of the set, the picture still pixelates.
Everyone in Bures is complaining.
| link to this comment |
Select more comments
Your comment please